Here's an ancient -- but still relevant -- piece from Tim O'Reilly: "Software and Business Method Patents".
Here's a great article in Slate on the consequences of software patents. "Weapons of Business Destruction: How a tiny little 'patent troll' got BlackBerry in a headlock".
The biggest issue with software patents is always the "non-obvious" issue. Generally, this can be debated, so a prior art review is far more valuable.
See "Peer Review Starts for Software Patent Applications: IEEE Spectrum talks to the founder to Peer-to-Patent Beth Noveck". This is where the rubber hits the road.
To participate, see Peer To Patent. Locate prior art and make patent trolls get real jobs.
Also, see this: "A patent improvement: Intellectual property: A new scheme will solicit comments via the internet to improve the vetting of patent applications".
Just like we don't want patents to restrict software development, we don't want companies to restrict the flow of info on the internet. Check out the article by Tim Berners-Lee in Scientific American titled "Long Live the Web"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=long-live-the-web
Justices to Hear Microsoft Patent Case
ReplyDeleteBy REUTERS
Published: November 29, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/technology/30bizcourt.html?ref=technology